In an explanation made on Monday, FG guaranteed that Kanu represents a flight risk. This declaration was made by FG in a sworn statement that it submitted on the side of its solicitation to end the judgment’s execution.
tvguidetime.com
The body of evidence against Kanu, as indicated by the FG, “verges on public safety,” and he was named as “a flight risk person.”
“The Respondent is a flight risk individual. Valuing the range of affidavits in our application is significant.
“One of the grounds of our application is that this matter addresses the public safety of the state.
— Mike Ozekhome San (@MikeozekhomeS) October 24, 2022
“We depend working on it of FRN Versus Dokubo, where the High Court held that where public safety is compromised or the probability of it being undermined, basic freedoms assume an optional position.
“When there is a danger to public safety, the common freedoms of any individual can be suspended until the such danger is dealt with.
